Proof: Posterior distribution for Bayesian linear regression
Theorem: Let
\[\label{eq:GLM} y = X \beta + \varepsilon, \; \varepsilon \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2 V)\]be a linear regression model with measured $n \times 1$ data vector $y$, known $n \times p$ design matrix $X$, known $n \times n$ covariance structure $V$ as well as unknown $p \times 1$ regression coefficients $\beta$ and unknown noise variance $\sigma^2$. Moreover, assume a normal-gamma prior distribution over the model parameters $\beta$ and $\tau = 1/\sigma^2$:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-prior} p(\beta,\tau) = \mathcal{N}(\beta; \mu_0, (\tau \Lambda_0)^{-1}) \cdot \mathrm{Gam}(\tau; a_0, b_0) \; .\]Then, the posterior distribution is also a normal-gamma distribution
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post} p(\beta,\tau|y) = \mathcal{N}(\beta; \mu_n, (\tau \Lambda_n)^{-1}) \cdot \mathrm{Gam}(\tau; a_n, b_n)\]and the posterior hyperparameters are given by
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-par} \begin{split} \mu_n &= \Lambda_n^{-1} (X^\mathrm{T} P y + \Lambda_0 \mu_0) \\ \Lambda_n &= X^\mathrm{T} P X + \Lambda_0 \\ a_n &= a_0 + \frac{n}{2} \\ b_n &= b_0 + \frac{1}{2} (y^\mathrm{T} P y + \mu_0^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \mu_0 - \mu_n^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_n \mu_n) \; . \end{split}\]Proof: According to Bayes’ theorem, the posterior distribution is given by
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-BT} p(\beta,\tau|y) = \frac{p(y|\beta,\tau) \, p(\beta,\tau)}{p(y)} \; .\]Since $p(y)$ is just a normalization factor, the posterior is proportional to the numerator:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-JL} p(\beta,\tau|y) \propto p(y|\beta,\tau) \, p(\beta,\tau) = p(y,\beta,\tau) \; .\]Equation \eqref{eq:GLM} implies the following likelihood function
\[\label{eq:GLM-LF-class} p(y|\beta,\sigma^2) = \mathcal{N}(y; X \beta, \sigma^2 V) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{(2 \pi)^n |\sigma^2 V|}} \, \exp\left[ -\frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} (y-X\beta)^\mathrm{T} V^{-1} (y-X\beta) \right]\]which, for mathematical convenience, can also be parametrized as
\[\label{eq:GLM-LF-Bayes} p(y|\beta,\tau) = \mathcal{N}(y; X \beta, (\tau P)^{-1}) = \sqrt{\frac{|\tau P|}{(2 \pi)^n}} \, \exp\left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} (y-X\beta)^\mathrm{T} P (y-X\beta) \right]\]using the noise precision $\tau = 1/\sigma^2$ and the $n \times n$ precision matrix $P = V^{-1}$.
Combining the likelihood function \eqref{eq:GLM-LF-Bayes} with the prior distribution \eqref{eq:GLM-NG-prior}, the joint likelihood of the model is given by
Collecting identical variables gives:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-JL-s2} \begin{split} p(y,\beta,\tau) = \; & \sqrt{\frac{\tau^{n+p}}{(2 \pi)^{n+p}} |P| |\Lambda_0|} \, \frac{ {b_0}^{a_0}}{\Gamma(a_0)} \, \tau^{a_0-1} \exp[-b_0 \tau] \cdot \\ & \exp\left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} \left( (y-X\beta)^\mathrm{T} P (y-X\beta) + (\beta-\mu_0)^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 (\beta-\mu_0) \right) \right] \; . \end{split}\]Expanding the products in the exponent gives:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-JL-s3} \begin{split} p(y,\beta,\tau) = \; & \sqrt{\frac{\tau^{n+p}}{(2 \pi)^{n+p}} |P| |\Lambda_0|} \, \frac{ {b_0}^{a_0}}{\Gamma(a_0)} \, \tau^{a_0-1} \exp[-b_0 \tau] \cdot \\ & \exp\left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} \left( y^\mathrm{T} P y - y^\mathrm{T} P X \beta - \beta^\mathrm{T} X^\mathrm{T} P y + \beta^\mathrm{T} X^\mathrm{T} P X \beta + \right. \right. \\ & \hphantom{\exp \left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} \right.} \; \left. \left. \beta^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \beta - \beta^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \mu_0 - \mu_0^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \beta + \mu_0^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \mu_0 \right) \right] \; . \end{split}\]Completing the square over $\beta$, we finally have
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-JL-s4} \begin{split} p(y,\beta,\tau) = \; & \sqrt{\frac{\tau^{n+p}}{(2 \pi)^{n+p}} |P| |\Lambda_0|} \, \frac{ {b_0}^{a_0}}{\Gamma(a_0)} \, \tau^{a_0-1} \exp[-b_0 \tau] \cdot \\ & \exp\left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} \left( (\beta-\mu_n)^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_n (\beta-\mu_n) + (y^\mathrm{T} P y + \mu_0^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \mu_0 - \mu_n^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_n \mu_n) \right) \right] \end{split}\]with the posterior hyperparameters
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-beta-par} \begin{split} \mu_n &= \Lambda_n^{-1} (X^\mathrm{T} P y + \Lambda_0 \mu_0) \\ \Lambda_n &= X^\mathrm{T} P X + \Lambda_0 \; . \end{split}\]Ergo, the joint likelihood is proportional to
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-JL-s5} p(y,\beta,\tau) \propto \tau^{p/2} \cdot \exp\left[ -\frac{\tau}{2} (\beta-\mu_n)^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_n (\beta-\mu_n) \right] \cdot \tau^{a_n-1} \cdot \exp\left[ -b_n \tau \right]\]with the posterior hyperparameters
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-tau-par} \begin{split} a_n &= a_0 + \frac{n}{2} \\ b_n &= b_0 + \frac{1}{2} (y^\mathrm{T} P y + \mu_0^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_0 \mu_0 - \mu_n^\mathrm{T} \Lambda_n \mu_n) \; . \end{split}\]From the term in \eqref{eq:GLM-NG-JL-s5}, we can isolate the posterior distribution over $\beta$ given $\tau$:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-beta} p(\beta|\tau,y) = \mathcal{N}(\beta; \mu_n, (\tau \Lambda_n)^{-1}) \; .\]From the remaining term, we can isolate the posterior distribution over $\tau$:
\[\label{eq:GLM-NG-post-tau} p(\tau|y) = \mathrm{Gam}(\tau; a_n, b_n) \; .\]Together, \eqref{eq:GLM-NG-post-beta} and \eqref{eq:GLM-NG-post-tau} constitute the joint posterior distribution of $\beta$ and $\tau$.
- Bishop CM (2006): "Bayesian linear regression"; in: Pattern Recognition for Machine Learning, pp. 152-161, ex. 3.12, eq. 3.113; URL: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387310732.
Metadata: ID: P10 | shortcut: blr-post | author: JoramSoch | date: 2020-01-03, 17:53.